Answer:
Many have found marital counseling, with either clerical or lay therapists, quite beneficial. While no therapist can solve every marital problem, many have succeeded in changing the course of their rocky relationships through counseling.

On the other hand, there are the unfortunate many who fail to save their marriages through conventional marriage counselling. One of the necessary elements for most forms of marriage counseling to work is that both parties earnestly want the marriage to succeed. Often, one party wants the marriage to succeed, while the other wants out. Another ill-fated approach to training to save a marriage through counseling happens when one or both of the parties attend the sessions because they feel that it is expected of them.

When a divorcing person announces his or her plans for ending a marriage to friends or family members, the classical response is the question: "Have you tried marriage counseling?" Many people, in anticipation of this question, see to it that they can respond: "Yes, we've tried marriage counseling, and it didn't work. Some couples are turned off by the idea of marriage counseling, and so never attend. Others get turned off once the process is initiated. An unskilled or clumsy counselor can actually contribute to the problems dividing the couple. Our approach to helping couples reconcile their issues is discussed on our "Reconciliation" page. The approach does not rely on psychology, but on understanding the realities of divorce, the needs and issues of the parties, and the best approach for communicating, arguing and solving problems.

Answer:
As a matter of fact, some conflict and disagreements are important for long-term success in marriage. The key is really how argument is conducted. In other words, does argument usually escalate tension, or does it typically lead to a feeling of resolution.

Sometimes, the problem is basically a lack of some interpersonal skills or understanding of the other's point of view, values, personality or temperament. Sometimes, the problem is not lack of skill or understanding, but rather the noxious byproduct of the negativity that has dominated the marriage.

Couples in this toxic environment can benefit greatly by learning how to break the cycle of negativity and pattern arguments, in order to give certain repair mechanisms a chance to work. Before and during potentially touchy discussions, troubled couples should make an agreement to limit discussions of contentious issues to 15 or 20 minutes (tops) at a single sitting.

Learning to calm down after arguments is the first step to a constructive resolution. Arguing spouses need to recognize when they are feeling overwhelmed and at the point of saying things they would soon live to regret.

Once accustomed to recognizing these threshold points, individuals can begin deliberate efforts to calm down. If you must call for a time-out to cool off, then do it. A very important skill or discipline that can benefit everyone is the ability to listen or speak without becoming defensive or promoting defensiveness.

Non-defensive listening helps ease the couple's defensive style of speaking to one another. Defensiveness is very dangerous and encourages the cycle of negativity. By finding the courage not to be defensive, or by minimizing it as much as possible, many troubled marriages can begin to improve.

Another key to living well together is validation; letting the other know with little clues that his or her point of view is understood. This can be one of the most powerful tools for healing in a relationship, marital or otherwise. Instead of attacking or ignoring each other's views, the partners try to see the problem from each other's perspective. Validation is simply putting oneself in the other's shoes and vividly imagining how they must feel and believe. This very effective technique is also known as the "first position perceptual shift." To reinforce this learning, it is important - once some success has been experienced - continue to practice these lessons until they become automatic.

Answer:
Divorces occur for different reasons. Some people have just grown apart. Others can't argue or make important joint decisions constructively. Many people who are unhappy or unfulfilled in their marriages do stay together until the their children are a certain age, or until they have all left the nest.

There is a lot of controversy in the research about whether the decision to divorce or to stay married in a loveless marriage effects the children one way or the other. Writers in this area have even contradicted themselves over time. Many people become better parents and better friends with each other following a divorce.

One thing is for certain, however. If the divorce is being contemplated because of Domestic Violence, things only get worse for all involved if the abuse is permitted to continue. While offenders can be rehabilitated, it is not in the children's best interests for cohabitation to continue in the presence of continuing violence. Please visit our "Domestic Violence" page for more information on this subject.

Staying together or divorcing for the sake of the children depends upon the nature and extent of the marital discord. The key question to ask is whether the unhappy couple could cooperate on parenting issues when staying together. In other words, if the decision to stay is premised upon what's best for the children, there has to be a conscious decision by both parents to the effect that their needs to be happy in a marital relationship are being subordinated by the needs of the children to have their parents stay together.

That being the case, if the couple cannot realistically expect to function as a unit in parenting their children, the decision to stay together for the sake of the children should be rejected as a "lose-lose" proposition.

Answer:
All children, regardless of age and gender, feel a short term impact resulting from their parents' divorce. Please consider the following general observations (they are ONLY general observations), often reported as descriptive behaviors or symptoms, by age:

Preschoolers: These children sometimes suffer sleep disturbances. They may have problems with toilet training and eating with utensils, and may forget skills they had earlier mastered.

5-6 years old: These children may throw temper tantrums and show other signs of increased aggression. They sometimes harbor feelings of self-blame and intense sadness.

6-8 years old: These children long for their parents' reconciliation. Like the preschoolers, they sometimes experience sleep disturbances. They also want to appear and be loyal to both parents.

9-12 years old: Conversely, these children feel and direct anger at both parents, but often side with one. They experience extreme feelings of embarrassment and mortification.

13-18 years old: These children experience more extremes than the 9-12 years old group, including extremely angry and blameful reactions. Interestingly, many of them worry about their personal finances and assets, and whether they would have to directly suffer the economic effects of the divorce.

Loyalty conflicts are also observed to exist. Some of these youngsters are engaged in increasing sexual exploration. Others go into social withdrawal and may experience anxiety about their relationships. The bottom line is that children experience short-term adjustments to separation and divorce at every age. There is no "right age," as far as the children are concerned, to divorce.

One phenomenon I have observed rather often is the brooding contempt that many adult children have expressed "and I'm talking people in their thirties and forties" toward their elder parents, who waited until all the children were all married-off to announce their plans for not going into retirement together. Many of them believe that they were made to live a lie, and that their positive recollections of childhood were, in large part, orchestrated illusions.

Answer:
Gender comes into play as well. Males usually react differently from the way females do. Males often become aggressive, with females frequently becoming withdrawn. For most children "as long as the battling stops between the parents" life becomes more stable after the first year of divorce. This is particularly true where they are transferred from a hostile home to a calm one.

But whether their parents stay married or divorce, if there is constant conflict, children will suffer long-term consequences either way. I believe that children can and do survive divorce, as long as their parents declare a truce with each and go on to provide a relatively predictable lifestyle for their children to feel secure about sharing.

Answer:
No. If a marriage is irretrievably broken, a separation only succeeds in postponing the inevitable. In New Jersey, a separation cannot compel an unwilling spouse to provide financial information, divide assets, allocate debts or pay support.

Answer:
Either party can choose to leave the marital residence. However, an attorney should be consulted before making this or any other major change in circumstances. In some situations, physical separation is advisable.

However, in many cases, leaving the home may have serious negative consequences to the person doing the leaving. This is particularly true if the person leaving is seeking custody of the children, but chooses to allow the children to remain in the residence with the other parent. Departure from the home may also create an otherwise avoidable financial burden for both parties.

Answer:
The court will rarely compel either party to leave the marital home until the divorce is final, except in the event of domestic violence.

Only in unique circumstances would a party be compelled to leave the home in the absence of domestic violence. Victims of physical abuse or verbal harassment should consider call the police or applying directly to the Courts for protection.

An emergent order may be entered by either a Municipal or Family Court judge to immediately exclude the allegedly abusive spouse from the marital home. A hearing is supposed to be held within ten days to determine whether there is enough evidence to keep the allegedly violent spouse from returning to the home on a permanent basis. If such an order is granted, the violent spouse will not be permitted to return to the home, except to retrieve personal belongings, and then, only with a police escort. If unsupervised parenting time with the other spouse is ordered, transfers are often accomplished "curb-side.

Answer:
In New Jersey, there are several "fault-based" grounds and one "no fault" cause of action for divorce. In most cases, fault has no bearing on how marital assets will be divided or on how support and alimony issues will be decided.

Many lawyers and judges consider the concept of marital fault to be dead in New Jersey absent truly bizarre circumstances. In rare cases, the Court may consider the grounds for divorce as a factor in determining alimony. Again, this is the exception as opposed to the rule.

Without digressing from the realities, the provable claim would have to be something along the lines of the spouse at fault visiting the other, sickly spouse "while in the hospital and in guarded condition" to share the existence of a continuing affair with a dear friend of the ailing spouse, with the friend having already moved into the marital home, wearing the hospitalized spouse's pajamas to bed.

Fault is an emotional factor in a divorce, but it typically has little or no influence on the terms of a final settlement.

Answer:
Extreme Cruelty is the most commonly used ground for divorce. More than one-half of the divorces in New Jersey are based on extreme cruelty.

Common factors can include allegations that the other spouse: is too tight or too loose with money; denies necessities; uses too much or not enough credit; neglects monthly payments; spends unreasonably; is overly controlling; has an erratic employment history; causes embarrassment or humiliating experiences; abuses alcohol or drugs; gambles compulsively or unacceptably; is sexually inconsideration; refuses to have sexual intercourse; is sexually excessive; makes unreasonable sexual demands; engages in perversions; is impotent; is homosexual or bi-sexual; plays mind games; dates other people, short of adultery or deviant sexual conduct; refuses to do chores; doesn't fulfill the role as parent, spouse or supporter; lies; commits fraudulent acts; conceals information; insists upon not enough or too many social activities out of the home; uses offensive language; perpetrates acts of domestic violence; lacks personal hygiene; lacks initiative; exhibits noxious or distancing interpersonal behaviors; uses the cold shoulder treatment; employs domineering behaviors; engages in non-productive or aggravating arguments; launches threats; displays unwarranted jealousy; has a rotten temper; is mentally ill; acts neurotic; is emotionally unstable; commits crimes; has conflicting religious beliefs or practices; drives badly or dangerously; harbors unreasonable obsessions; incites provocation; engages in inappropriate acts of retaliation; displays indifference (the true opposite of love); lacks affection; nags incessantly; refuses to have children.

Many have accurately observed that allegations sufficient to sustain a divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty involve shortcomings, problems or disappointments common to even healthy, thriving marriages. The unspoken policy of the State of New Jersey is not to force anyone to stay married who does not wish to continue in that relationship.

The allegations can be rather light and there is no necessity to recite every repugnant act ever committed by the other party in a Complaint for Divorce. In fact, in the event a Trial is ever actually convened, most Judges are not interested in hearing any testimony or reviewing any evidence that is not relevant to economic, parenting, credibility or safety issues, or to proving the existence of acts amounting to domestic torts or civil offenses occurring within the relationship.

Answer:
This question, which has to be asked of divorce lawyers thousands of times in any given year, is quite possibly the result of watching too many old movies on TV.

There were times, dating back to before the American Revolution, when couples who mutually wanted to end their marriages would actually hire actors to stage adulterous liaisons with one or the other of them, as well as private detectives to document and testify to the performance they observed.

Much more recently, but still a good many years ago, boudoir photos were often part of the divorce trial. Practically speaking, if one of a married pair wants out of the marriage, the marriage will end, with or without the others' consent or objection.

Answer:
In a divorce, the court declares the marriage contract broken; in an annulment, the court says that there never was a marriage.

Annulment is more difficult to prove - and much rarer - than divorce. To go this route, it is strongly advised that an attorney be consulted. Out of the great many people who have consulted with our offices on the possibility of obtaining an annulment over the years, only three had sustainable grounds.

If an annulment is sought for religious reasons, consult with a priest, minister, or rabbi as well. Just because a New Jersey Court grants your Compliant for Annulment ( Nullity ), does not mean your religious faith will recognize the Annulment.

Answer:
There are two general types of support: Child support, which is support paid by one spouse to the other for the benefit of the children and (2) Alimony or spousal support, which is support paid by one spouse to the other for the maintenance of the other spouse.

Answer:
Definitely. While the amount of tax-free child support, in most cases, is calculated by using the Guidelines, alimony is not. Alimony is typically a negotiable issue.

If the payor spouse is in a significantly higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse, the alimony portion of any support payment will be of significant benefit to the payor spouse and to the recipient spouse, inasmuch as the recipient spouse would be taxed at a much lower rate.

Optimizing the tax consequences of support is one way to improve overall post-divorce divided family finances, which is often neglected. The manner in which dependency deductions are taken, use of the Head of Household filing status, the right mix of alimony versus child support payments are all considerations to take into account to maximize tax savings.

Both parties should agree to do this with the assistance of a tax accountant, because cash maximization opportunities could be quite substantial.

Answer:
Yes. In fact, one does not even need to file a Divorce Complaint in order to obtain support. Instead, a Complaint can be filed for "Separate Maintenance."

Even in a divorce context, while the divorce is pending, support can be awarded by the filing of a what is referred to as a Pendente Lite Motion. As it's Latin name suggests, it is used to establish continuing arrangements pending litigation. After such a motion is filed, a determination will be made by the Court as to how much support, alimony or housing, transportation and personal expenses should be paid pending a final determination of all issues. Other relief can be requested as well.

Answer:
Child support is based on Child Support Guidelines in New Jersey. Generally speaking, it is determined by taking the income of each of the parties, along with a number of other factors, and then using various formulae as established by a committee of the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Besides including the income of the parties, the amount of time that each party spends with their children is also a factor so that, in some sense, the more time that a parent spends with the children, the lower his or her child support obligation will be.

There are also several other factors that go into the equation, including the requirement to pay child care. The only way to make an accurate determination as to how much the child support obligation will be is to have all the necessary information available, and then utilize the guidelines step-by-step, in order to find the definitive amount.

Answer:
The court has adopted guidelines, which are intended to provide guidance about what it actually costs to raise children. The Guidelines fix a range of support that should be paid by both parents, proportionate to their available incomes. There is a rebuttable presumption that the Guidelines are correct, providing, for example, that the children have not reached 18, are not away at college, and provided further that the combined net weekly income of the parents does not exceed $2,900; $150,800 combined net annual available income per year (after subtracting out tax, social security, and other allowable deductions from gross income). However, child support amounts may be negotiated above or even below those in the Guidelines amounts - provided just cause can be shown for going below them. The judge may modify the levels in the Guidelines if a finding can be made that - due to the circumstances of a particular family, the Guidelines amount would be unjust or otherwise inappropriate. As alluded to earlier, the court may deviate from the Guidelines if the combined net income of both parties is more than $2,900 per week. The costs of work related child care and the marginal cost of providing health insurance for any child, is also factored into the child support calculations.

Answer:
If the family's combined weekly net income is greater than $2,900 per week "or for any of the other reasons enumerated in Appendix IX-A of the Rules of Court, which sets forth Considerations in the Use of Child Support Guidelines" Judges are to determine child support by using the criteria contained in the appropriate statute.

This should be done in much the same way as the Judges are required to determine alimony, child custody, equitable distribution, etc. Pursuant to Zazzo v. Zazzo, 245 N.J. Super. 124, 129 (App. Div. 1990): The Legislature has dictated that certain factors must be considered in setting support. These factors reinforce the distinction between spousal support and child support in cases not covered by court rule.

N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 provides: a. In determining the amount to be paid by parent for support of the child and the period during which the duty of support is owed, the court in those cases not governed by court rule shall consider, but not be limited to, the following factors:

Needs of the child;
Standard of living and economic circumstances of each parent;
All sources of income and assets of each parent;
Earning ability of each parent, including educational background, training, employment skills, work experience, custodial responsibility for children, including the cost of providing child care and the length of time and cost of each parent to obtain training or experience for appropriate employment;
Need and capacity of the child for education, including higher education; Age and health of the child and each parent;
Income, assets and earning ability of the child;
Responsibility of the parents for the court-ordered support of others;
Reasonable debts and liabilities of each child and parent;
and Any other factors the court may deem relevant.

In Pascale v. Pascale, 140 N.J. 583 (1985) the Supreme Court found that it is within a court's discretion to consider the child support guidelines and the statutory criteria when determining a child support award that is in the child's best interests.

Answer:
Child support concludes upon the emancipation of the child or children.

What this actually means is that child support discontinues when the child is expected to be self supporting. There is no fixed time for emancipation, however. The issue is a question of fact. In general, however, emancipation may occur upon a child reaching majority, upon the child's graduation from secondary education, upon the child's entry into the armed forces, upon the child's marriage, upon the child's graduation from post secondary or even graduate school, or at any other time that the Court believes the child is expected to be self-supporting.

Answer:
Definitely. While the amount of tax-free child support, in most cases, is calculated by using the Guidelines, alimony is not. Alimony is typically a negotiable issue.

If the payor spouse is in a significantly higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse, the alimony portion of any support payment will be of significant benefit to the payor spouse and to the recipient spouse, inasmuch as the recipient spouse would be taxed at a much lower rate.

Optimizing the tax consequences of support is one way to improve overall post-divorce divided family finances, which is often neglected. The manner in which dependency deductions are taken, use of the Head of Household filing status, the right mix of alimony versus child support payments are all considerations to take into account to maximize tax savings.

Both parties should agree to do this with the assistance of a tax accountant, because cash maximization opportunities could be quite substantial.

Answer:
Yes. In fact, one does not even need to file a Divorce Complaint in order to obtain support. Instead, a Complaint can be filed for "Separate Maintenance."

Even in a divorce context, while the divorce is pending, support can be awarded by the filing of a what is referred to as a Pendente Lite Motion. As it's Latin name suggests, it is used to establish continuing arrangements pending litigation. After such a motion is filed, a determination will be made by the Court as to how much support, alimony or housing, transportation and personal expenses should be paid pending a final determination of all issues. Other relief can be requested as well.

Answer:
No. Courts are not as reluctant as they once were to grant sole custody to fathers. In New Jersey, there is a "gender neutrality," with no presumption that either parent is a better custodial parent than the other.

This applies regardless of the age of the children. Although the "Tender Years Doctrine" has yet to be written-off in New Jersey, most psychological associations have abandoned it years ago. Please consult out "Child Custody" page for more information on how custody determinations are made by the courts.

Answer:
Unless the parties can agree, custody is determined by the "best interests of the children" standard. Both parents begin the process with an equal entitlement to parenting rights. There are statutory and other criteria, which Judges are to apply in making custody and parenting determinations. Please visit our "Child Custody" page to view a listing of these criteria.

The Supreme Court in Beck v. Beck, 86 N.J. 480, 485 (1981) stated that the "pertinent statute [N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23] provides courts with broad authorization for custody determinations in divorce proceedings ...." See also Terry v. Terry, 270 N.J. Super 105 (App.Div.1994).

Generally, in New Jersey, there are two overall concepts of child custody.

The first is "Legal Custody." This refers to the authority vested in the parents to make decisions of a non-routine nature, which affect the child's health education or welfare. For example: While what to serve a child for dinner on any given day is a routine decision, the decision that a child will be raised in a religion where certain dietary laws and restrictions must be observed is non-routine.

While determining to take a child to be entertained at the movies may be a routine decision, deciding what maturity level the child should be exposed to may be non-routine.

Deciding to bring a child for a haircut is arguably routine, while allowing a child to color, tint or radically cut his or her hair might be more non-routine.

Allowing a child to wear a press-on "tattoo," providing it is suitable to the child's circumstances, is rather routine, permitting a child to have a piercing done is not routine.

Deciding to drop a child off at school is routine, while determining that a child will attend a particular school or course of study is not. We mention these examples, because there are two types of Legal Custody; Sole Legal Custody and Joint Legal Custody. Both have to do with parental authority to make important non-routine affecting the child.

In a Joint Legal Custody arrangement, there is the underlying presupposition that parents will eventually develop the ability to come to joint decisions of a non-routine nature. There must always be consultation between the parents on such issues before a decision of this variety is made and acted upon.

If one parent makes such a decision without consulting the other, the non-included parent can make a motion for appropriate relief before the Court. For instance, one parent signs a child up for summer football camp, without telling the other parent " who may be opposed to the physical risks involved. The other parent can file a motion with the Court to prevent the child from attending the camp, and to caution the other parent about making any further one-sided decisions of a non-routine nature. The Judge may or may not grant the motion.

In a Sole Legal Custody situation, one parent is the Legal Custodian and does not have to consult with the other in making important non-routine decisions. The other parent, conversely, has a duty to request the custodial parent's permission or consent to every non-routine parenting decision. If the non-custodial parent, for example, decides to pull a child out of school for a week to go for a surprise trip to Disney World without the express permission of the custodial parent, the objecting parent can file a motion to prevent the unplanned vacation from happening. Once again, a Judge is left to decide the motion on a case-by-case basis.

The Sole Legal Custodial Parent, however, must act responsibly in making decisions that are in the child's best interests. If the other parent is concerned that the custodial parent is about to make or has made a decision inimical to the child's best interests, that parent can make an appropriate motion to the Judge, who will decide the case either way.

The second general child custody concept in New Jersey is the concept of physical or residential custody. Residential custody is likewise broken down into subcategories.

Sole Residential Custody. In this custodial arrangement, the sole custodial parent has the child living with them for greater than five days out of the average week, which does not include vacation arrangements. The other parent has parenting time with the child, but less than two overnight equivalents in the average week.

Shared Residential Custody. Here, neither parent has the children more than five days a week, or less than two days a week, on the average In the context of this arrangement, the nomenclature is different. The parent who has the children for the majority of the average week is known as the "parent of primary residence" (PPR), while the parent having the children for less than half of the time is called the "parent of alternate residence" (PAR). This distinction is made, even if the PPR has the children 183 nights out of the year and the PAR has the kids to remaining 182.

Split Residential Custody. In this somewhat unusual scenario, one or some of the children would live primarily with one parent, while the remaining child or children would live primarily with the other. Cases do come up from time to time where certain children would benefit from living primarily with one parent over the other, and vice versa, with the benefit of doing so outweighing the children's interests in living with their siblings. One example would involve children in two entirely different age groups, with entirely different needs, better met by one parent than the other. Perhaps the couple's 16 years old figure skating daughter is an Olympics hopeful. Dad's business has taken him to a locale where the daughter can train with the best of the best. Mom, on the other hand, is a physician with a New Jersey practice and a son who is in kindergarten with some health care issues. Once again, while these arrangements are uncommon, they do occur.

However, this change in nomenclature does not change the fact that one party or the other will usually have the children in their home more than the other. When this is an issue, and the parties cannot agree, there is a process established by the Rules of Court to deal with unresolved parenting issues. Please consider the following guidelines:

5:8-1. Investigation Before Award In family actions in which the court finds that the custody of children is a genuine and substantial issue the court shall refer the case to mediation in accordance with the provisions of R. 1:40-5.

Included below is the content of R. 1:40-5 for ready reference:

1:40-5. Mediation of Custody and Parenting Time Actions (a) Screening and Referral. All complaints or motions involving a custody or parenting time issue shall be screened to determine whether the issue is genuine and substantial, and if such a determination is made, the matter shall be referred to mediation for resolution in the child's best interests.

However, no matter shall be referred to mediation if there is in effect a preliminary or final order of domestic violence entered pursuant to the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 et seq.).

In matters involving domestic violence in which no order has been entered or in cases involving child abuse or sexual abuse, the custody or parenting time issues shall be referred to mediation provided that the issues of domestic violence, child abuse or sexual abuse shall not be mediated in the custody mediation process. The mediator or either party may petition the court for removal of the case from mediation based upon a determination of good cause.

(b) Conduct of Mediation. In addition to the general requirements of Rule 1:40-4, the parties shall be required to attend a mediation orientation program and may be required to attend an initial mediation session.

Mediation sessions shall be closed to the public. The mediator and the parties should consider whether it is appropriate to involve the child in the mediation process. The mediator or either party may terminate a mediation session in accordance with the provisions of Rule 1:40-4(f).

(c) Mediator Not to Act as Evaluator. The mediator may not subsequently act as an evaluator for any court-ordered report nor make any recommendation to the court respecting custody and parenting time. Included below is the content of R. 1:40-4 for ready reference:

1:40-4. Mediation - General Rules (a) Referral to Mediation. Except as otherwise provided by these rules, a Superior Court or Municipal Court judge may require the parties to attend a mediation session at any time following the filing of a complaint.

(b) Compensation and Payment of Mediators. Parties in Superior Court, except the Special Civil Part, assigned to mediation pursuant to this rule shall equally share the fees and expenses of the mediator on an ongoing basis, subject to court review and allocation to create equity. Any fee or expense of the mediator shall be waived in cases, as to those parties exempt, pursuant to Rule 1:13-2(a). A party may opt out of the mediation process after the mediator has expended three hours of service, which shall include preparation and the first mediation session, and which shall be at no cost to the parties. Fees shall be as determined by the mediator and the parties. Failure to pay the mediator may result in an order by the court to pay and imposing appropriate sanctions.

(c) Confidentiality. Except as otherwise provided by this rule and unless the parties otherwise consent, no disclosure made by a party during mediation shall be admitted as evidence against that party in any civil, criminal, or quasi- criminal proceeding. A party may, however, establish the substance of the disclosure in any such proceeding by independent evidence. A mediator has the duty to disclose to a proper authority information obtained at a mediation session on the reasonable belief that such disclosure will prevent a participant from committing a criminal or illegal act likely to result in death or serious bodily harm. No mediator may participate in any subsequent hearing or trial of the mediated matter or appear as witness or counsel for any person in the same or any related matter. A lawyer representing a client at a mediation session shall be governed by the provisions of RPC 1.6.

(d) Limitations on Service as a Mediator.
(1) Mediators shall be qualified and trained in accordance with the provisions of Rule 1:40-12.

(2) No elected official, or candidate for elected office, shall serve as a CDR mediator within the geographic boundary of the elected office.

(3) The approval of the Assignment Judge is required for service as a mediator by any of the following:
(A) appointed public officials;

(B) police or other law enforcement officers employed by the State or any local unit of government;

(C) employees of any court;

(D) government officials or employees whose duties involve regular contact with the court in which they serve; or

(E) elected officials, or candidates for elected office, who wish to serve outside the geographic boundaries of the elected office. (4) The Assignment Judge shall also have the discretion to require prior review and approval of the Supreme Court of prospective mediators whose employment or position appears to the Assignment Judge to require such review and approval. (e) Conduct of Mediation Proceedings. Mediation proceedings shall commence with an opening statement by the mediator describing the purpose and procedures of the process. Non-party witnesses may be heard in the discretion of the mediator, and other non-parties shall be permitted to attend only with the consent of the parties and the mediator. Multiple sessions may be scheduled. Attorneys and parties have an obligation to participate in the mediation process in good faith in accordance with program guidelines.

(f) Termination of Mediation.
(1) The mediator or a participant may terminate the session if

(A) there is an imbalance of power between the parties that the mediator cannot overcome,

(B) a party challenges the impartiality of the mediator,

(C) there is abusive behavior that the mediator cannot control, or

(D) a party continuously resists the mediation process or the mediator. (2) The mediator shall terminate the session if (A) there is a failure of communication that seriously impedes effective discussion, (B) the mediator believes a party is under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or (C) the mediator believes continued mediation is inappropriate or inadvisable for any reason.

(g) Final Disposition. If the mediation results in the parties' total or partial agreement, it shall be reduced to writing and a copy thereof furnished to each party. The agreement need not be filed with the court, but if formal proceedings have been stayed pending mediation, the mediator shall report to the court whether agreement has been reached. If an agreement is not reached, the matter shall be referred back to court for formal disposition. 5:8-1. Investigation Before Award (Continued) During the mediation process, the parties shall not be required to participate in custody evaluations with any expert. The parties may, however, agree to do so.

The mediation process shall last no longer than two months from the date it commences or is ordered to commence, whichever is sooner. The court, on good cause shown, may extend the time period.

The date for conclusion of mediation shall be set forth in any Case Management Order(s).

If the mediation is not successful in resolving custody issues, the court may before final judgment or order require an investigation to be made by the Family Division of the character and fitness of the parties, the economic condition of the family and the financial ability of the party to pay alimony or support or both.

In other family actions the court may, if the public interest so requires, order such an investigation.

The court may continue any family action for the purpose of such investigation, but shall not withhold the granting of any temporary relief by way of alimony, support or pendente lite orders pertaining to parenting issues under R. 5:5-4 and R. 5:7-2 where the circumstances require.

Such investigation of the parties shall be conducted by the Family Division of the county of venue, notwithstanding that one of the parties may live in another county, and the Family Division shall file its report with the court no later than 45 days after its receipt of the judgment or order requiring the investigation, unless the court otherwise provides.

Such investigation of the parties shall be conducted by the probation office of the county of the home state of the child, notwithstanding that one of the parties may live in another country or state. 5:8-2. Direction for Periodic Reports If an award of custody of minor children has been made, the court may in its discretion file a certified copy of its order or judgment with the probation office of the county or counties in which the child or children reside with a direction therein to such probation office to make periodic reports to the court as to the status of the custody.

It shall be the duty of counsel to file 2 copies of the order or judgment with the probation office within 2 days, together with information concerning the exact place of residence of the child or children.

Upon the filing of such report, the court may on its own motion and where it deems it necessary, reopen the case and schedule a formal hearing on proper notice to all parties.

A certified copy of a custody decree of another state filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of this State shall be sent to the probation office of the county or counties in which the child or children reside. 5:8-3. Investigation After Award The court may on its own motion when it deems it necessary or where an application is made by either party to modify the award or terms thereof, in its discretion require the investigation provided for in R. 5:8-1. The court may continue such application for the purpose of such investigation and report. 5:8-4. Filing of Reports The written report of an investigation made pursuant to this rule shall be filed with the court, shall be furnished to the parties, and shall thereafter be filed in the office of the Chief Probation Officer.

The report shall be regarded as confidential, except as otherwise provided by rule or by court order.

The report shall be received as direct evidence of the facts contained therein which are within the personal knowledge of the probation officer who made the investigation and report, subject to cross-examination. 5:8-5. Custody and Parenting Time/Visitation Plans, Recital in Judgment or Order (a) In any family action in which the parties cannot agree to a custody or parenting time/visitation arrangement, the parties must each submit a Custody and Parenting Time/Visitation Plan to the court no later than seventy-five (75) days after the last responsive pleading, which the court shall consider in awarding custody and fixing a parenting time or visitation schedule.

Contents of Plan. The Custody and Parenting Time/Visitation Plan shall include but shall not be limited to the following factors:
(1) Address of the parties.

(2) Employment of the parties.

(3) Type of custody requested with the reasons for selecting the type of custody.

(a) Joint legal custody with one parent having primary residential care.

(b) Joint physical custody.

(c) Sole custody to one parent, parenting time/visitation to the other.

(d) Other custodial arrangement.
(4) Specific schedule as to parenting time/visitation including, but not limited to, week nights, weekends, vacations, legal holidays, religious holidays, school vacations, birthdays and special occasions (family outings, extracurricular activities and religious services).

(5) Access to medical school records.

(6) Impact if there is to be a contemplated change of residence by a parent.

(7) Participation in making decisions regarding the child(ren).

(8) Any other pertinent information.
(b) The court shall set out in its order or judgment fully and specifically all terms and conditions relating to the award of custody and proper support for the children.

(c) Failure to comply with the provisions of the Custody and Parenting Time/Visitation Plan may result in the dismissal of the non-complying party's pleadings or the imposition of other sanctions, or both. Dismissed pleadings shall be subject to reinstatement upon such conditions as the court may order. 5:8-6. Trial of Custody Issue Where the court finds that the custody of children is a genuine and substantial issue, the court shall set a hearing date no later than six months after the last responsive pleading.

(Personal Note: In all of my years of doing custody work, I have never once experienced or even heard of a custody hearing date being set any earlier than six months after the last responsive pleading, except in one particular County, which was then taking about three years to hold divorce trials.)

The court may, in order to protect the best interests of the children, conduct the custody hearing in a family action prior to a final hearing of the entire family action.

As part of the custody hearing, the court may on its own motion or at the request of a litigant conduct an in camera interview with the child or children.

(Personal Note: In camera judicial interviews of children age seven or older, until quite recently, were mandatory if either the Judge or one of the parents desired that one be conducted. Now, whether or not an interview will be conducted is left entirely to the sound discretion of the Judge.)

In the absence of good cause, the decision to conduct an interview shall be made before trial.

(Personal Note: There was a time not too long ago, where Judges differed widely on when to convene the interview. Some conducted them very early in the case, some just before trial, and still others, following the conclusion of the trial but prior to deciding the parenting issues.)

If the court elects not to conduct an interview, it shall place its reasons on the record.

If the court elects to conduct an interview, it shall afford counsel the opportunity to submit questions for the court's use during the interview and shall place on the record its reasons for not asking any question thus submitted.

A stenographic or recorded record shall be made of each interview in its entirety.

Transcripts thereof shall be provided to counsel and the parties upon request and payment for the cost. However, neither parent shall discuss nor reveal the contents of the interview with the children or third parties without permission of the court.

Counsel shall have the right to provide the transcript or its contents to any expert retained on the issue of custody.

Any judgment or order pursuant to this hearing shall be treated as a final judgment or order for custody. 5:8A. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR CHILD In all cases where custody or parenting time/visitation is an issue, the court may, on the application of either party or the child or children in a custody or parenting time/visitation dispute, or on its own motion, appoint counsel on behalf of the child or children.

Counsel shall be an attorney licensed to practice in the courts of the State of New Jersey and shall serve as the child's lawyer.

The appointment of counsel should occur when the trial court concludes that a child's best interest is not being sufficiently protected by the attorneys for the parties. Counsel may, on an interim basis or at the conclusion of the litigation, apply for an award of fees and costs with an appropriate affidavit of services, and the trial court shall award fees and costs, assessing same against either or both of the parties. 5:8B. APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM (a) Appointment. In all cases in which custody or parenting time/visitation is an issue, a guardian ad litem may be appointed by court order to represent the best interests of the child or children if the circumstances warrant such an appointment.

The services rendered by a guardian ad litem shall be to the court on behalf of the child. A guardian ad litem may be appointed by the court on its own motion or on application of either or both of the parents.

The guardian ad litem shall file a written report with the court setting forth findings and recommendations and the basis thereof, and shall be available to testify and shall be subject to cross-examination thereon.

In addition to the preparation of a written report and the obligation to testify and be cross-examined thereon, the duties of a guardian may include, but need not be limited to, the following:

Answer:
While an adulterous spouse's marital might well be unspeakably outrageous from the perspective of the loyal spouse, it is an emotional concern with little relevance to the issue of child custody.

One possible impact of a spouse's infidelity on the child custody determination would be if the spouse had introduced the lover or lovers into the lives of the children. Another thing that will be taken into consideration is the character and behavior of the new love interest, to the extent it affects the children.

Certainly, if the new companion is a pedophile, sex offender, drug addict, alcoholic, violent, abusive, and the like, this could have a negative effect upon the custody determination as obtains to the parent who has chosen such an unsavory association.

Answer:
Alimony, as opposed to child support calculated pursuant to the Guidelines, is not as definitive and is based on a number of statutory factors. In N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b), New Jersey's alimony Statute provides: In all actions brought far divorce, divorce from bed and board, or nullity the, court may award one or more of the following types of alimony: permanent alimony; rehabilitative alimony; limited duration alimony or reimbursement alimony to either party.

In doing so, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following factors: The actual need and ability of the parties to pay. The duration of the marriage. The age and physical and emotional health of the parties. The standard of living established in the marriage and the likelihood that each party can maintain a reasonably comparable standard of living. The earning capacities, educational levels, vocational skills, and employability of the parties. The length of absence from the job market of the party seeking maintenance. The parental responsibilities for the children. The time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient education or training to enable the party seeking maintenance to find appropriate employment, the availability of the training and employment, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets and income. The history of the financial or non-financial contributions to the marriage by each party including contributions to the care and education of the children and interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities. The equitable distribution of property ordered and any pay-outs on equitable distribution, directly or indirectly, out of current income, to the extent this consideration is reasonable, just and fair. The income available to either party through investment of any assets held by that party. The tax treatment and consequences to both parties of any alimony award including the designation of all or a portion of the payment as a non-taxable payment.

Any other factors which the Court may deem relevant. The New Jersey Supreme Court in Crews v. Crews, 164 N.J. 11, 26 (2000), held that "[a]n alimony award that lacks consideration of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) is inadequate, and one finding that must be made, is the standard of living established in the marriage." The Court found that "[i]n all divorce proceedings, trial courts must "consider and make specific findings' under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)" Id. at 25.

The Appellate Division in Boardman v. Boardman, 314 N.J. Super. 340 (1998) reiterated the application of the principles for determining alimony as set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, noting that the principles apply whether the spouse seeking alimony is the husband or wife.

The alimony statute in New Jersey was recently amended so that the court is now permitted to award not only permanent or rehabilitative alimony but also limited duration alimony and reimbursement alimony.

There are no fixed "guidelines" as there are with regard to child support. However, based upon computations done by many experienced divorce attorneys on the heals of findings in contested alimony cases ending in trial, it is obvious that many judges are using mathematical formulas to determine spousal support, despite case law mandating that mathematical formulae not be used.

Attorneys sitting as Early Settlement Program Panelists often use the formulae they believe the Judges in their County to be using in making their spousal support recommendations.

Ideally, the way to begin calculating alimony - apart from considering the factors contained in the statute - is to scrutinize the budgetary requirements associated with running two separate households, compared with the income generating ability of each of the divorced parties. This takes some thought and time.

Tax consequences should also be calculated in. But, it can't be emphasized enough that ALL the statutory factors must be considered in the determining whether there is an alimony entitlement, what type or types of alimony will be involved, and what level of payment might reasonably be agreed to or awarded.

Failing to settle the issue of alimony is one of the major reasons cases are forced into trial. It is crucial - in any case where alimony may be in issue - that both parties retain experienced divorce attorneys to represent them. In most cases involving average circumstances, mature and well-read matrimonial attorneys should be able to develop a settlement range for alimony in rather short order.

Failing to settle a case - for instance - because one side feels there is some entitlement to alimony and the other side maintains there is not, is nothing short of idiotic in most circumstances. Experienced divorce attorneys can usually distinguish an alimony case from a non-alimony case quite quickly.

Answer:
Alimony is taxable to the recipient and deductible for the payor, unless the support Order states otherwise. The payment of child support has no tax effect. In most matrimonial cases involving minor children, where the spouses earn unequal incomes, both alimony and child support are likely to be ordered.

Answer:
Definitely. While the amount of tax-free child support, in most cases, is calculated by using the Guidelines, alimony is not. Alimony is typically a negotiable issue.

If the payor spouse is in a significantly higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse, the alimony portion of any support payment will be of significant benefit to the payor spouse and to the recipient spouse, inasmuch as the recipient spouse would be taxed at a much lower rate.

Optimizing the tax consequences of support is one way to improve overall post-divorce divided family finances, which is often neglected. The manner in which dependency deductions are taken, use of the Head of Household filing status, the right mix of alimony versus child support payments are all considerations to take into account to maximize tax savings.

Both parties should agree to do this with the assistance of a tax accountant, because cash maximization opportunities could be quite substantial.

Answer:
Yes. In fact, one does not even need to file a Divorce Complaint in order to obtain support. Instead, a Complaint can be filed for "Separate Maintenance."

Even in a divorce context, while the divorce is pending, support can be awarded by the filing of a what is referred to as a Pendente Lite Motion. As it's Latin name suggests, it is used to establish continuing arrangements pending litigation. After such a motion is filed, a determination will be made by the Court as to how much support, alimony or housing, transportation and personal expenses should be paid pending a final determination of all issues. Other relief can be requested as well.

Answer:
All property acquired by the parties during their marriage is subject to "equitable distribution." The purpose of equitable distribution is to achieve a fair distribution of what the parties acquired during their marriage. "Equitable" does not necessarily mean that the property will be divided one-half to each of the parties. New Jersey is not a so-called "community property" State, where this would necessarily be the case. In New Jersey, there is no initial presumption in favor of an equal division. The theory is based upon viewing the marriage as a partnership or joint enterprise, so that even if one party technically acquired all of the assets through earned income, while the other was at home and not working outside the home, the Court would still recognize that the marriage was, in fact, a partnership and that, but for the fact that the unemployed spouse was at home keeping the household for the family, the employed spouse would not have had the opportunity to earn the income for the marital partnership. Thus, the identity of the person who actually earned the money becomes largely immaterial and, unless the parties can agree upon a fair distribution, the Court would distribute all property in a manner that it deems "equitable."

Answer:
Equitable distribution means a fair division of the assets and liabilities acquired during the marriage. The court has the discretion to divide the assets in any manner that it determines is "fair" although not necessarily equal. In N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, New Jersey's equitable distribution Statute, the Legislature has mandated: In every case, the court shall make specific findings of fact and evidence relevant to all issues pertaining to asset eligibility or ineligibility, assets valuation, and equitable distribution including specifically, but not limited to the factors set forth in this section.

New Jersey's N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 contains 15 specific and 1 general "catch-all" factor, as follows: Duration of the marriage. Age and physical and emotional health of the parties. Income or property brought to the marriage of the parties. The standard of living established during the marriage. Any written agreement made by the parties before or during the marriage concerning the arrangement of property distribution. The economic circumstances of each party at the time the division of property becomes effective. The income and earning capacity of each party including educational background, training, employment skills, work experience, length of absence from the job market, custodial responsibilities for the children and the time and expense necessary to require sufficient education or training to enable the party to become self-supporting at a standard of living reasonably comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage. The contribution by each party to the education, training or earning power of the other. The contribution of each party to the acquisition, dissipation, preservation, depreciation or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property as well as the contribution of a party as a homemaker. The tax consequences of the proposed distribution to each party. The present value of the property. The need of a parent who has physical custody of the child to own or occupy the marital residence and to use or own the household affects. The debts and liabilities of the parties. The need for creation, now or in the future, of a trust fund to secure reasonably foreseeable medical or educational costs for a spouse or children. The extent to which a party deferred achieving their career goals. Any other factors which the Court may deem relevant. Pursuant to Painter v. Painter, 65 N.J. 196, 211 (1974), Guideline criteria over the broad spectrum of litigation in this area include: (1) respective age, background and earning ability of the parties; (2) duration of the marriage; (3) the standard of living of the parties during the marriage; (4) what money or property each brought into the marriage; (5) the present income of the parties; (6) the property acquired during the marriage by either or both parties (7) the source of acquisition (8), the current value and income producing capacity of the property; (9) the debts and liabilities of the parties to the marriage; (10), the present mental and physical health of the parties; (11) the probability of continuing present employment at present earning:, or better in the future; (12) effect of distribution of assets on the ability to pay alimony and support, and (13) gifts from one spouse to the other during marriage. [118 N.J. Super at 335.] In Kikkert v. Kikkert, 88 N.J. 4, 9 (1981), Justice Pashman states in a concurring opinion: "... the primary purpose of marital property distribution laws is not to compensate for changes in the parties' fortunes after they have separated, but to achieve a fair distribution of what the parties 'lawfully and beneficially acquired' while they were together. Depending upon a given party's goals, the party. with the help of legal counsel, may seek to convince the court that these factors dictate that you receive the highest possible percentage distribution of assets. Q. What property is not subject to equitable distribution? There are several categories of property not subject to distribution. The major ones include property acquired before the marriage (or joint enterprise-type cohabitation), or gratuitous transfers by way of gifts, devise or bequests from third parties, which were maintained separately from marital assets. In other words, absent a pre-nuptial agreement, if property is acquired prior to marriage, it must be kept separately and not allowed to co-mingle with other marital property. If real property was purchased or inherited prior to marriage - while it may start out immune to claims of equitable distribution - should the property be maintained, improved or prepared with money earned or otherwise received during the marriage, that property might slowly find its way onto the bargaining table.

Answer:
No. This is a widely held misconception. There may or may not be an equitable entitlement to titled property by the untitlted spouse, but keeping the title in one party's name alone accomplishes very little.

Buying property in one's own name during marriage accomplishes nothing in terms of immunizing it. There are exceptions. One example would be where a party came into a marriage with a money market fund, kept it entirely separate throughout the marriage, then received an inheritance during the marriage, which was not co-mingled with other marital funds, but rather immediately incorporated into the pre-existing fund. The entire fund - as augmented by the inheritance - would continue to be immune to claims of equitable distribution.

Answer:
In most cases, the deeding over would be regarded as evidence of an inter-marital gift of one-half of the property to the previously non-titled spouse.

Answer:
There are two basic scenarios by which one spouse can collect benefits using the other spouse's Social Security record.

Scenario 1:
At the time of the divorce, the ex-spouse is receiving Social Security benefits. If so, one ex-spouse can receive benefits on the other ex-spouse's Social Security record provided that the following requirements are met: The parties were married for at least ten years before their divorce became final;
The spouse applying is at least 62 years old;
The spouse applying is not married at the time application for benefits is made; and
The individual benefits of the spouse applying are less than 50% of the ex-spouse's benefits.

Scenario 2:
At the time of the divorce, the ex-spouse is eligible for, but not receiving, Social Security benefits. In this scenario, the spouse applying must meet all the requirements in Scenario 1, and the ex-spouse must be at least 62 years old. To collect under this scenario, the spouse applying must wait 60 days after the divorce is final to apply for benefits.
The spouse applying would be entitled to 50% of the ex-spouse's benefits under both scenarios. The ex-spouse's benefits are not reduced by any payments the spouse applying would be entitled to. (Example: The ex-spouse is collecting, or eligible to collect, $2,000 per month. The spouse applying would be entitled to receive $1,000 per month and the ex-spouse would still be entitled to receive $2,000 per month). The amount of benefits the spouse applying would receive as a divorced spouse is not affected, in the event the ex-spouse remarries.
Such derivative Social Security benefits are also affected when the derivative spouse recipient remarries or the other ex-spouse dies. If the derivative recipient remarries and the other ex-spouse is alive, derivative benefits will stop one month after the remarriage. If the derivative recipient spouse remarries and then the other ex-spouse dies, the derivative benefit recipient will become eligible once again for benefits, but now, the derivative recipient would be collecting as a "surviving divorced spouse." The benefits under this classification are higher than the benefits as a "divorced spouse." The amount of benefits paid to a surviving divorced spouses will depend on the survivor's age at the time of the ex-spouse's death. If the surviving divorced spouse is 60-64, that spouse will receive a percentage (between 71% and 94% as determined by the survivor's age) of the ex-spouse's benefits. If the survivor is are 65 or older, 100% of the ex-spouse's benefits will be paid out.
An ex-spouse will have to provide the other ex-spouse's Social Security number when applying for benefits, if attempting to collect under the other ex-spouse's Social Security record.

The Social Security Administration can answer any questions you have on this matter. Their toll free number is currently 1-800-772-1213.

Answer:
Some people believe that abusive conduct is limited to physical violence.

However, this is not the case. Emotional abuse, imprisonment, physical intimidation, threats, financial blackmail, and sexual cruelty are all forms of abuse that you should respond to in order to protect yourself and your children.

These types of behavior can escalate to physical violence, and witnessing abusive behavior between parents in any of its various forms can have a long-term detrimental effect upon children.

Blackened eyes, bruises and fractures should not be a prerequisite for seeking help. Emotional scars are sometimes equally damaging and difficult to heal. Physical abuse must be viewed in the broadest possible sense. Any angry touching, shoving or bumping is physically abusive.

Emotional abuse can take many forms. A distinction must be made between mere insensitivity and deliberate mental or emotional cruelty. Abuse should not be tolerated in an effort to preserve the marriage "for the sake of the children." Long-term harm to children who have witnessed to a parent's fear, shame and humiliation outweigh any benefit derived from preserving an abusive relationship.

Spouses who prevent their mates from seeking help, or simply from temporarily getting out of harm's way are abusers. Barring the door, confiscating car keys, or hiding wallets, pocket-books or clothing are all acts that prevent a victim from escaping potential domestic abuse or violence. This is "imprisonment."

While imprisoning itself is an act of terror, imprisoning one's spouse or "lover" can lead to physical assaults or even torture. Physical intimidation often precedes other acts of violence. While verbal terroristic threats may never be spoken, the person engaging in the intimidation may communicate the threat of immediate harm to the victim " quite convincingly " yet non-verbally. There is no question left in the victim's mind that the slightest hesitation in yielding to the abuser's demands will trigger an escalation of violence.

Domestic Violence can take many forms. Please carefully review our "Domestic Violence" page for a comprehensive listing of types of abusive conduct New Jersey recognizes as actionable under its Domestic Violence Act.

Answer:
Physical violence should be immediately reported to the police, or to a Superior Court Judge or Hearing Officer and a restraining order applied for to prohibit the abuser from returning to your residence and from committing any further acts of Domestic Violence.

Initially, a Temporary Restraining Order ( TRO ) will be issued, on the condition that the Judge, Magistrate or Hearing Officer believes one is necessary to deter further acts of Domestic Violence .

If you report the violence to the police during the hours of about 6:00AM to about 3:30PM, the officer taking the report will, in all likelihood, direct you to your County's Superior Family Court, where you will given the opportunity to tell your story to a Hearing Officer or Judge, who will decide whether a TRO should issue.

If you report the violence to the police after about 3:30PM on a week day (Court closes at 4:40PM), or on the weekend, the officer taking your report is supposed to convey your complaint of Domestic Violence to a Municipal Court Judge, who is supposed to be on-call for the purpose of reviewing such complaints. Sometimes, this does not happen the way it should in practice.

Answer:
It has been observed on more than just a few occasions that "absent signs of a physical assault" some police departments do not contact their Municipal Court Judge for review and decision but, instead, send the complaining victim away with the advice that they should make their complaint in Family Court during the week, between 8:30AM and 4:30PM.

This is an abusive practice, entirely inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the Domestic Violence Act. The Act is designed to curtail violence before it becomes physical violence. It is for this reason that complaining victims "whenever possible" go to the police department with another adult companion.

Be prepared to vigorously protest any decision against issuing a TRO that was not made by the on-call Judge. The following is excerpted from New Jersey's Domestic Violence Procedures Manual, and should be quoted to the reporting officer if there are any problems related to a refusal to present your case to a Judge:

Guidelines on Police Response Procedures in Domestic Violence Cases
VI. Emergent Temporary Restraining Orders.
A. Where... the victim requests an immediate court order, the officer shall contact the designated Judge by telephone, radio, or other means of electronic communication.

The officer should:
1. Assist the victim in preparing a statement to be made to the Judge.
2. Explain that the Judge will place the person under oath and ask questions about the incident.
3. If the Judge issues a temporary restraining order, the police officer will be instructed to enter the Judge's authorization on a prescribed form. Demand your right to be heard! It is yours to exercise.

Answer:
If a TRO is entered, the Defendant will be served with the Order and a copy of your complaint, and a Hearing date set on the issue of whether a Final Restraining Order (FRO ) will be granted or not.
Never set aside a restraining order once obtained. Always have a copy of it in your possession.

Answer:
Yes. The police or the courts may not be the first line of assistance, depending on the nature of the abusive conduct.

Options for help include consulting a lawyer, seeing a mental-health professional for both abused spouse and the children, as well as seeking out support groups and community services for abused spouses and their families.

It should be noted that there are many abusive behaviors that do not arise to the level of domestic violence as defined by the Act. It should likewise be acknowledged that many people who otherwise qualify for protection under the Act, will not opt to seek the court's involvement in that regard. Instead, they may decide to divorce or separate from their abusive partners without filing a domestic violence complaint.

Some may try to save and heal their abusive relationship through counseling. Others might just decide to stick it out.

Answer:
On a rather disturbing note, it is true that groundless domestic violence complaints are filed every year.

There appears to be three leading motivations for abusing the system in this fashion.
1. The "victim" wants to exclude the estranged spouse or lover from the home.
2. The "victim" wants to achieve a perceived advantage in the context of a contested child custody action.
3. The "victim" wants to punish the alleged aggressor for things having nothing whatsoever to do with domestic violence.

If an innocent party has been unjustly accused of an act or acts of domestic violence, it is strongly recommended that competent legal counsel be immediately sought. Pro se representation should be avoided if at all possible.

In choosing an attorney to defend against a false domestic violence claim, great care must be taken to ensure that the attorney is well-versed and experienced in this area of the law. It is extremely difficult to get rid of a Final Restraining Order "once one has been entered" without the purported victim's consent. Experienced New Jersey Family Lawyers with special knowledge of our domestic violence laws should be contacted the moment it is suspected that a false accusation may emerge.